SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Raklet

Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Raklet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 35 that differ from Raklet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Raklet has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Raklet” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at RakletFound at Raklet, not found there
Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Class Managerclassmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Class Manager 22/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Fontevafonteva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fonteva 22/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P 22/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec 22/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
YourMembershipyourmembership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YourMembership 22/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Jackrabbitjackrabbitclass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jackrabbit 17/100 1 Status page with history 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Campaicampai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Campai 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.