Transparency alternatives to Easyverein
Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Easyverein. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Easyverein on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Easyverein has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Easyverein” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Easyverein | Found at Easyverein, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Rakletraklet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raklet | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Class Managerclassmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Class Manager | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fontevafonteva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fonteva | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| YourMembershipyourmembership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YourMembership | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.