Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot
Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Wild Apricot. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Wild Apricot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Wild Apricot has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Wild Apricot” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Wild Apricot | Found at Wild Apricot, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ | 43/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Fortesiumfortesium.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Fortesium | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister | 35/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Class Managerclassmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Class Manager | 22/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Fontevafonteva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fonteva | 22/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec | 22/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| YourMembershipyourmembership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YourMembership | 22/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Jackrabbitjackrabbitclass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jackrabbit | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Kicksitekicksite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kicksite | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.