SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Jackrabbit

Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Jackrabbit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 35 that differ from Jackrabbit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Jackrabbit has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Jackrabbit” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at JackrabbitFound at Jackrabbit, not found there
Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 Status page with history Compare
TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ 43/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia 30/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Rakletraklet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raklet 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
Class Managerclassmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Class Manager 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Fontevafonteva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fonteva 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
YourMembershipyourmembership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YourMembership 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.