SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone

Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at GrowthZone. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 35 that differ from GrowthZone on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

GrowthZone has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at GrowthZone” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at GrowthZoneFound at GrowthZone, not found there
Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ 43/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Rakletraklet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raklet 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister 35/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec 22/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Jackrabbitjackrabbitclass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jackrabbit 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Kicksitekicksite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kicksite 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Campaicampai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Campai 13/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Fortesiumfortesium.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Fortesium 13/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.