Transparency alternatives to Fonteva
Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fonteva. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Fonteva on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fonteva has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Fonteva” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fonteva | Found at Fonteva, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ | 43/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Rakletraklet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raklet | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Jackrabbitjackrabbitclass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jackrabbit | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Campaicampai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Campai | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Kicksitekicksite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kicksite | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.