Transparency alternatives to Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector
Other Workflow automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector | Found at Ei Dynamics Cloud Connector, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapierzapier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zapier | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Mergemerge.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Merge | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Tray.aitray.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Tray.ai | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Trigger.devtrigger.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Trigger.dev | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Pipedreampipedream.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pipedream | 57/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Boomiboomi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boomi | 52/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Tallyfytallyfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tallyfy | 48/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Automation Anywhereautomationanywhere.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Automation Anywhere | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Kissflowkissflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kissflow | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Process Streetprocess.stSee also Transparency alternatives to Process Street | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| n8nn8n.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to n8n | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Knitgetknit.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Knit | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.