SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to KIE

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at KIE. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from KIE on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

KIE has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at KIE” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at KIEFound at KIE, not found there
Sorocosoroco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soroco 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Temporaltemporal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Temporal 39/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Signaviosignavio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signavio 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Cardanitcardanit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cardanit 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Emakinemakin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emakin 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Kestra Cloudkestra.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kestra Cloud 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Flowableflowable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowable 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Viflowviflow.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Viflow 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Aureaaurea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aurea 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Qprqpr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qpr 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Skanskan.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Skan 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Solvediosolvedio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Solvedio 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.