SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Prozessportal

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Prozessportal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Prozessportal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Prozessportal has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Prozessportal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Prozessportal does notProzessportal publishes, and they do not
Sorocosoroco.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Temporaltemporal.io 35/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Signaviosignavio.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Skanskan.ai 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Mehrwerkmehrwerk.eu 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Fluxiconfluxicon.com 13/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Aureaaurea.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Decisionsdecisions.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Flowableflowable.com 26/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Qprqpr.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Viflowviflow.de 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Apromoreapromore.org 17/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.