Transparency alternatives to Assignar
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Assignar. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Assignar on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Assignar has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Assignar” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Assignar | Found at Assignar, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Hero Softwarehero-software.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hero Software | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Newformanewforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Newforma | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| O3 Solutionso3.solutionsSee also Transparency alternatives to O3 Solutions | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| RIB Softwarerib-software.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RIB Software | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Boxcoreboxcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boxcore | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.