Transparency alternatives to Procore
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Procore. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Procore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Procore has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Procore” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Procore | Found at Procore, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Hero Softwarehero-software.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hero Software | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Boxcoreboxcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boxcore | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Newformanewforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Newforma | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| O3 Solutionso3.solutionsSee also Transparency alternatives to O3 Solutions | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| RIB Softwarerib-software.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RIB Software | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SmartPMsmartpmtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartPM | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.