Transparency alternatives to Hero Software
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Hero Software. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Hero Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Hero Software has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Hero Software” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Hero Software | Found at Hero Software, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Newformanewforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Newforma | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Assignarassignar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assignar | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Boxcoreboxcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boxcore | 26/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SmartPMsmartpmtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartPM | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Rakenrakenapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raken | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Aproplanaproplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aproplan | 17/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.