Transparency alternatives to Boxcore
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Boxcore. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Boxcore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Boxcore has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Boxcore” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Boxcore | Found at Boxcore, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Assignarassignar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assignar | 32/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| SmartPMsmartpmtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartPM | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| CUBE CDEcube.msSee also Transparency alternatives to CUBE CDE | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Rakenrakenapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raken | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| PlanRadarplanradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PlanRadar | 25/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Sitedrivesitedrive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitedrive | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.