SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Dalux

Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dalux. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 64 that differ from Dalux on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Dalux has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Dalux” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DaluxFound at Dalux, not found there
CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Assignarassignar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assignar 22/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit 39/100 1 Status page with history 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hero Softwarehero-software.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hero Software 35/100 1 Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore 30/100 1 Status page with history 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal 30/100 1 Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Boxcoreboxcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boxcore 26/100 1 Data processing agreement 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
Newformanewforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Newforma 26/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
SmartPMsmartpmtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartPM 26/100 1 Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
PlanRadarplanradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PlanRadar 25/100 1 Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.