Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Bluebeam. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Bluebeam on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Bluebeam has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Bluebeam” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Bluebeam | Found at Bluebeam, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hero Softwarehero-software.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hero Software | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| O3 Solutionso3.solutionsSee also Transparency alternatives to O3 Solutions | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| RIB Softwarerib-software.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RIB Software | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Archdeskarchdesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Archdesk | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| eSUBesub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to eSUB | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Hyphen Solutionshyphensolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyphen Solutions | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.