SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to eSUB

Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that eSUB does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from eSUB on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

eSUB has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and eSUB does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and eSUB does noteSUB publishes, and they do not
Bluebeambluebeam.com 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Daluxdalux.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Hero Softwarehero-software.de 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Procoreprocore.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Bridgitgobridgit.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Congridcongrid.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Newformanewforma.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Assignarassignar.com 23/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sitedrivesitedrive.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
SmartPMsmartpmtech.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Aproplanaproplan.com 17/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Archdeskarchdesk.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.