SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to eSUB

Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at eSUB. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 63 that differ from eSUB on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

eSUB has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at eSUB” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at eSUBFound at eSUB, not found there
Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam 30/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hero Softwarehero-software.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hero Software 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Newformanewforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Newforma 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
SmartPMsmartpmtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartPM 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore 30/100 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Boxcoreboxcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boxcore 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
O3 Solutionso3.solutionsSee also Transparency alternatives to O3 Solutions 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.