Alternatives to Archdesk
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Archdesk does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Archdesk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Archdesk has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Archdesk does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Archdesk does not | Archdesk publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bluebeambluebeam.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Daluxdalux.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hero Softwarehero-software.de | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Congridcongrid.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Newformanewforma.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Assignarassignar.com | 23/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sitedrivesitedrive.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SmartPMsmartpmtech.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Aproplanaproplan.com | 17/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| eSUBesub.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.