SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Kontent.ai

Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kontent.ai does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Kontent.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Kontent.ai has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Kontent.ai does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Kontent.ai does notKontent.ai publishes, and they do not
Uniformuniform.dev 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Directusdirectus.io 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Pantheonpantheon.io 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Contentstackcontentstack.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Craft CMScraftcms.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Hygraphhygraph.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
ButterCMSbuttercms.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Progress Sitefinityprogress.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cockpitgetcockpit.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Ibexaibexa.co 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Joomlajoomla.org 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
CoreMediacoremedia.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.