Alternatives to Onlim
Other Conversational AI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Onlim does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Onlim on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Onlim has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Onlim does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Onlim does not | Onlim publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certainlycertainly.io | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Forethoughtforethought.ai | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Voiceflowvoiceflow.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Botpressbotpress.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Netominetomi.com | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tiledesktiledesk.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Landbotlandbot.io | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Chatfuelchatfuel.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Kommunicatekommunicate.io | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Kore.aikore.ai | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Moveworksmoveworks.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| moinAImoin.ai | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.