Transparency alternatives to ETA Data Direct
Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ETA Data Direct. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 14 that differ from ETA Data Direct on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ETA Data Direct has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at ETA Data Direct” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ETA Data Direct | Found at ETA Data Direct, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Legalonelegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Legal | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Verbit Courtsverbit.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Verbit Courts | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| equivantequivant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to equivant | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| TrusteSolutionstrustesolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrusteSolutions | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| VIQ Solutionsviqsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VIQ Solutions | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| US Legal Supportuslegalsupport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to US Legal Support | 13/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Conduent Courtsconduent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conduent Courts | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| CourtCallcourtcall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CourtCall | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Jano Technologiesjanotech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jano Technologies | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Journal Technologiesjournaltech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Journal Technologies | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Netsentialnetsential.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netsential | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to File & ServeXpress | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.