SaaS Ranking

Certifications named in IT documentation and asset tracking

Naming SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly is the low bar; not naming them is a signal.

18 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 46%. Last checked 2026-10-19.

46% here against 24% across every category we measure. IT documentation and asset tracking sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Certifications named across all categories, or to IT documentation and asset tracking.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found18
  • Not found at checked addresses21
  • Not measured1

40 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

VendorWhat we found
Ardoq https://www.ardoq.com/trust-centerChecked
Asset Panda https://www.assetpanda.com/public-security-information/Checked
Avolution https://trust.avolutionsoftware.com/Checked
Bizzdesign https://bizzdesign.com/bizzdesign-alfabet-trust-centerChecked
Cledara https://www.cledara.com/securityChecked
Device42 https://www.device42.com/use-cases/security-and-compliance/Checked
Electric https://electric.ai/blog/security-awareness-trainingChecked
EZOfficeInventory https://ezo.io/security/Checked
Oomnitza https://www.oomnitza.com/solutions/security-risk-management/Checked
Paligo https://paligo.net/security-and-compliance/Checked
Planview https://trust.planview.com/Checked
Reftab https://www.reftab.com/faq/how-does-reftab-keep-my-data-secureChecked
Setyl https://setyl.com/legal/securityChecked
Timly https://timly.com/Checked
Torii https://www.toriihq.com/securityChecked
Workwize https://www.goworkwize.com/securityChecked
Zluri https://www.zluri.com/securityChecked
Zylo https://trust.zylo.com/Checked
No named certification found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Aagon 6 addresses checkedChecked
Archipeg 6 addresses checkedChecked
Beam Dynamics 6 addresses checkedChecked
Corma 6 addresses checkedChecked
Docusnap 6 addresses checkedChecked
Firstbase 6 addresses checkedChecked
Hofy 6 addresses checkedChecked
Hudu 6 addresses checkedChecked
i-doit 6 addresses checkedChecked
IT Glue 6 addresses checkedChecked
IT Portal 6 addresses checkedChecked
Josys 6 addresses checkedChecked
LabStats 6 addresses checkedChecked
Lansweeper 6 addresses checkedChecked
LeanIX 6 addresses checkedChecked
Orbus 6 addresses checkedChecked
Sastrify 6 addresses checkedChecked
Snipe-IT 6 addresses checkedChecked
Substly 6 addresses checkedChecked
Valuemation 6 addresses checkedChecked
Vertice 6 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Productiv The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in IT documentation and asset tracking

Certifications named in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.