SaaS Ranking

Subprocessor list in IT documentation and asset tracking

Naming the actual subprocessors is what turns a privacy promise into something you can check.

5 of 40 companies we measured here publish it, that is 13%. Last checked 2026-10-19.

13% here against 7% across every category we measure. IT documentation and asset tracking sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Subprocessor list across all categories, or to IT documentation and asset tracking.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found5
  • Not found at checked addresses35
  • Not measured0

40 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

VendorWhat we found
Ardoq https://www.ardoq.com/sub-processorsChecked
IT Portal https://www.itportal.com/subprocessors/Checked
Paligo https://paligo.net/sub-processors/Checked
Planview https://www.planview.com/trust/subprocessors/Checked
Setyl https://setyl.com/legal/sub-processorsChecked
No subprocessor list found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Aagon 7 addresses checkedChecked
Archipeg 7 addresses checkedChecked
Asset Panda 7 addresses checkedChecked
Avolution 7 addresses checkedChecked
Beam Dynamics 7 addresses checkedChecked
Bizzdesign 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cledara 7 addresses checkedChecked
Corma 7 addresses checkedChecked
Device42 7 addresses checkedChecked
Docusnap 7 addresses checkedChecked
Electric 7 addresses checkedChecked
EZOfficeInventory 7 addresses checkedChecked
Firstbase 7 addresses checkedChecked
Hofy 7 addresses checkedChecked
Hudu 7 addresses checkedChecked
i-doit 7 addresses checkedChecked
IT Glue 7 addresses checkedChecked
Josys 7 addresses checkedChecked
LabStats 7 addresses checkedChecked
Lansweeper 7 addresses checkedChecked
LeanIX 7 addresses checkedChecked
Oomnitza 7 addresses checkedChecked
Orbus 7 addresses checkedChecked
Productiv 7 addresses checkedChecked
Reftab 7 addresses checkedChecked
Sastrify 7 addresses checkedChecked
Snipe-IT 7 addresses checkedChecked
Substly 7 addresses checkedChecked
Timly 7 addresses checkedChecked
Torii 7 addresses checkedChecked
Valuemation 7 addresses checkedChecked
Vertice 7 addresses checkedChecked
Workwize 7 addresses checkedChecked
Zluri 7 addresses checkedChecked
Zylo 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Other criteria in IT documentation and asset tracking

Subprocessor list in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.