SaaS Ranking

Public pricing in IT documentation and asset tracking

Hidden pricing moves the first comparison into a sales call.

Put the published price in context: compare pricing models and estimate setup, renewal and exit with the SaaS cost calculator.

21 of 38 companies we measured here publish it, that is 55%. Last checked 2026-10-19.

55% here against 38% across every category we measure. IT documentation and asset tracking sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Public pricing across all categories, or to IT documentation and asset tracking.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found21
  • Not found at checked addresses17
  • Not measured2

40 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Actual numbers on a public page.

VendorWhat we found
Archipeg https://www.archipeg.com/pricingChecked
Ardoq https://www.ardoq.com/plansChecked
Avolution https://www.avolutionsoftware.com/abacus/pricing/Checked
Beam Dynamics https://www.beamdynamics.io/pricingChecked
Cledara https://www.cledara.com/pricingChecked
Docusnap https://www.docusnap.com/en/pricingChecked
Electric https://electric.ai/pricingChecked
Hudu https://www.hudu.com/pricingChecked
IT Glue https://www.itglue.com/pricing/Checked
IT Portal https://www.itportal.com/pricing/Checked
LabStats https://labstats.com/pricing/Checked
Lansweeper https://www.lansweeper.com/pricing/Checked
Paligo https://paligo.net/pricing/Checked
Reftab https://www.reftab.com/pricingChecked
Sastrify https://www.sastrify.com/pricingChecked
Setyl https://setyl.com/pricingChecked
Snipe-IT https://snipeitapp.com/pricingChecked
Substly https://www.substly.com/en/Checked
Timly https://timly.com/en/pricing/Checked
Vertice https://www.vertice.one/pricingChecked
Workwize https://www.goworkwize.com/pricingChecked
No public pricing with figures found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Aagon 5 addresses checkedChecked
Asset Panda 5 addresses checkedChecked
Corma 5 addresses checkedChecked
Device42 5 addresses checkedChecked
EZOfficeInventory 5 addresses checkedChecked
Firstbase 5 addresses checkedChecked
Hofy 5 addresses checkedChecked
i-doit 5 addresses checkedChecked
Josys 5 addresses checkedChecked
LeanIX 5 addresses checkedChecked
Oomnitza 5 addresses checkedChecked
Orbus 5 addresses checkedChecked
Planview 5 addresses checkedChecked
Torii 5 addresses checkedChecked
Valuemation 5 addresses checkedChecked
Zluri 5 addresses checkedChecked
Zylo 5 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Bizzdesign The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Productiv The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in IT documentation and asset tracking

Public pricing in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.