SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in IT documentation and asset tracking

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

9 of 15 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 60%. Last checked 2026-09-03.

60% here against 41% across every category we measure. IT documentation and asset tracking sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to IT documentation and asset tracking.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
Aagon https://www.aagon.com/privacy-azure-marketplace/
Avolution https://www.avolutionsoftware.com/privacy/
Bizzdesign https://bizzdesign.com/policies/privacy-policy
Cledara https://www.cledara.com/privacy-policy
Docusnap https://www.docusnap.com/legal/datenschutz
Electric https://electric.ai/privacy-policy
Firstbase https://www.firstbase.com/privacy-policy
Lansweeper https://www.lansweeper.com/about/legal/privacy-policy/
Planview https://www.planview.com/trust/privacy/

No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Ardoq 7 addresses checked
Asset Panda 7 addresses checked
Corma 7 addresses checked
Device42 7 addresses checked
EZOfficeInventory 7 addresses checked
Hofy 7 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.