SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in IT documentation and asset tracking

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

17 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 44%. Last checked 2026-10-19.

44% here against 36% across every category we measure. IT documentation and asset tracking sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to IT documentation and asset tracking.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found17
  • Not found at checked addresses22
  • Not measured1

40 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
Aagon https://www.aagon.com/privacy-azure-marketplace/Checked
Avolution https://www.avolutionsoftware.com/privacy/Checked
Beam Dynamics https://www.beamdynamics.io/privacyChecked
Bizzdesign https://bizzdesign.com/policies/privacy-policyChecked
Cledara https://www.cledara.com/privacy-policyChecked
Corma https://www.corma.io/privacy-policyChecked
Docusnap https://www.docusnap.com/de/legal/datenschutzChecked
Electric https://electric.ai/privacy-policyChecked
Hudu https://www.hudu.com/privacy-policyChecked
Lansweeper https://www.lansweeper.com/about/legal/privacy-policy/Checked
Orbus https://www.orbussoftware.com/privacy-policyChecked
Planview https://www.planview.com/trust/privacy/Checked
Reftab https://www.reftab.com/privacy-policyChecked
Sastrify https://www.sastrify.com/privacy-policyChecked
Torii https://www.toriihq.com/privacy-noticeChecked
Zluri https://www.zluri.com/policy/privacy-policyChecked
Zylo https://zylo.com/privacy-policyChecked
No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Archipeg 7 addresses checkedChecked
Ardoq 7 addresses checkedChecked
Asset Panda 7 addresses checkedChecked
Device42 7 addresses checkedChecked
EZOfficeInventory 7 addresses checkedChecked
Firstbase 7 addresses checkedChecked
Hofy 7 addresses checkedChecked
i-doit 7 addresses checkedChecked
IT Glue 7 addresses checkedChecked
IT Portal 7 addresses checkedChecked
Josys 7 addresses checkedChecked
LabStats 7 addresses checkedChecked
LeanIX 7 addresses checkedChecked
Oomnitza 7 addresses checkedChecked
Paligo 7 addresses checkedChecked
Setyl 7 addresses checkedChecked
Snipe-IT 7 addresses checkedChecked
Substly 7 addresses checkedChecked
Timly 7 addresses checkedChecked
Valuemation 7 addresses checkedChecked
Vertice 7 addresses checkedChecked
Workwize 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Productiv The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in IT documentation and asset tracking

Named privacy contact in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.