SaaS Ranking
Menu

Coevera: what they publish

coevera.com · CRM · checked 2026-10-15

41/100DBand D

Rank 13 of 110 in CRM, where the median is 17.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-15. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

2 days since the newest dated result, 2 since the oldest. 11 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Coevera

coevera.com · CRM

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 41of 100 Rank 13 of 110

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 2 found, 1 not measured

Checked 2026-10-15. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Coevera has no such document.

Where Coevera sits in CRM

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 0.9%
  3. C3 3%
  4. D9 8%
  5. E27 25%
  6. F70 64%
110 vendors with a score; 7 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Coevera is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Coevera states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://coevera.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://coevera.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://coevera.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://coevera.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://coevera.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://coevera.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://coevera.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://coevera.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in CRM: 15 of 113 companies

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://coevera.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://coevera.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://coevera.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://coevera.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://coevera.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://coevera.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://coevera.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in CRM: 3 of 113 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.coevera.com/ – The name "status.coevera.com" could not be resolved.
  2. https://coevera.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://coevera.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in CRM: 17 of 113 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

  • Third-party hosts we saw on the first load 2 google-analytics.com, googletagmanager.com.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    region1.google-analytics.com

    Read at https://coevera.com/

    www.googletagmanager.com

    Read at https://coevera.com/

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://coevera.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: region1.google-analytics.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in CRM: 5 of 115 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://coevera.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://coevera.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://coevera.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://coevera.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://coevera.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://coevera.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://coevera.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://coevera.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in CRM: 9 of 110 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://coevera.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://coevera.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://coevera.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://coevera.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://coevera.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://coevera.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in CRM: 2 of 110 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 5
✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Australia, Canada, Frankfurt, Germany, Sydney, United States, Virginia (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). This does not establish the company’s headquarters. The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 7 exact wordings

    he nature of the incident, affected customers are coordinated with using the most appropriate means. Data Center Security Coevera uses Amazon Web Service (AWS) in USA , Canada , Australia and Europe r...

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    he nature of the incident, affected customers are coordinated with using the most appropriate means. Data Center Security Coevera uses Amazon Web Service (AWS) in USA , Canada , Australia and Europe r...

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    connects Coevera to your AI assistant, is currently hosted in the United States, so if your CRM is hosted in Frankfurt, Toronto or Sydney, the information your AI assistant sends to or receives from C...

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    lowing locations: North America › Toronto, Canada North America › Virginia, USA Europe › Frankfurt, Germany APAC › Sydney, Australia Can customers select their preferred hosting region?

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    connects Coevera to your AI assistant, is currently hosted in the United States, so if your CRM is hosted in Frankfurt, Toronto or Sydney, the information your AI assistant sends to or receives from C...

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    he nature of the incident, affected customers are coordinated with using the most appropriate means. Data Center Security Coevera uses Amazon Web Service (AWS) in USA , Canada , Australia and Europe r...

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    ure for Coevera resides in the following locations: North America › Toronto, Canada North America › Virginia, USA Europe › Frankfurt, Germany APAC › Sydney, Australia Can customers select their prefer...

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

Source: https://www.coevera.com/security/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Data location stated in CRM: 30 of 112 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.coevera.com/crm/pricing/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Public pricing in CRM: 58 of 111 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://coevera.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://coevera.com/

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://coevera.com/

Source: https://coevera.com/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in CRM: 64 of 115 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    expand_more We’re ISO 9001:2015 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified.

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

    Coevera Security | ISO 27001 Certified, GDPR Compliant CRM Products expand_more Coevera Voyager AI MCP Server NEW What's Ne

    Read at https://www.coevera.com/security/

Source: https://www.coevera.com/security/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Certifications named in CRM: 16 of 112 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.coevera.com/privacy/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Named privacy contact in CRM: 42 of 111 companies

Not measured by us 1
–

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Not measured. The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://coevera.com/.well-known/security.txt – blocked or unavailable (HTTP 403)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in CRM: 10 of 102 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-08: 41 of 1002026-10-15: 41 of 100 2026-10-08 2026-10-15
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Coevera in: 41 (2026-10-08), 41 (2026-10-15).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Coevera

5 found · 6 not found · 1 not measured across 12 public checks.

11 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-15.

Investigate 7 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  3. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  4. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  5. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  6. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  7. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.