Transparency alternatives to Lime CRM
Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Lime CRM does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 102 that differ from Lime CRM on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lime CRM has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Lime CRM does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Lime CRM does not | Lime CRM publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarifyclarify.ai | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Teamleaderteamleader.eu | 59/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| EspoCRMespocrm.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| EngageBayengagebay.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Capsulecapsulecrm.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| HubSpothubspot.com | 52/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Nutshellnutshell.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Twentytwenty.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Insightlyinsightly.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Ontraportontraport.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Raynetraynetcrm.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Tubulartubular.io | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.