Transparency alternatives to Teamleader
Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Teamleader. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 109 that differ from Teamleader on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Teamleader has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Teamleader” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Teamleader | Found at Teamleader, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EspoCRMespocrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EspoCRM | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Freshworks (Freshsales)freshworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freshworks (Freshsales) | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Clarifyclarify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarify | 70/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| EngageBayengagebay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EngageBay | 57/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| HubSpothubspot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HubSpot | 52/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Twentytwenty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twenty | 52/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Insightlyinsightly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insightly | 48/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SuiteDashsuitedash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuiteDash | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Coppercopper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Copper | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Vtigervtiger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vtiger | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Coeveracoevera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coevera | 41/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| CrmOnecrmone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CrmOne | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.