SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to EngageBay

Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at EngageBay. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 108 that differ from EngageBay on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

EngageBay has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at EngageBay” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at EngageBayFound at EngageBay, not found there
Insightlyinsightly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insightly 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Clarifyclarify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarify 70/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
HubSpothubspot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HubSpot 52/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Freshworks (Freshsales)freshworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freshworks (Freshsales) 39/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Nutshellnutshell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nutshell 65/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Teamleaderteamleader.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamleader 59/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Capsulecapsulecrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Capsule 52/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Closeclose.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Close 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Tubulartubular.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tubular 26/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
EspoCRMespocrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EspoCRM 65/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Twentytwenty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twenty 52/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
SuiteDashsuitedash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuiteDash 48/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.