Transparency alternatives to Twenty
Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Twenty does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 102 that differ from Twenty on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Twenty has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Twenty does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Twenty does not | Twenty publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insightlyinsightly.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Clarifyclarify.ai | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Teamleaderteamleader.eu | 59/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Capsulecapsulecrm.com | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nutshellnutshell.com | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| EspoCRMespocrm.com | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| HubSpothubspot.com | 52/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Freshworksfreshworks.com | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Ontraportontraport.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Tubulartubular.io | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Closeclose.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| EngageBayengagebay.com | 57/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.