Transparency alternatives to Vertica
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vertica. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Vertica on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vertica has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Vertica” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Vertica | Found at Vertica, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supabasesupabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supabase | 78/100 | 10 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +7 | nothing | Compare |
| Aivenaiven.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aiven | 78/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| SurrealDBsurrealdb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SurrealDB | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Neonneon.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon | 61/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Tiger Datatigerdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tiger Data | 61/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Weaviateweaviate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Weaviate | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Redisredis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Redis | 52/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Snowflakesnowflake.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snowflake | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| InfluxDatainfluxdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to InfluxData | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Tinybirdtinybird.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tinybird | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| MongoDB Atlasmongodb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MongoDB Atlas | 50/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Databricksdatabricks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Databricks | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.