Transparency alternatives to Replit
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Replit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 54 that differ from Replit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Replit has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Replit” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Replit | Found at Replit, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to CodeRabbit | 70/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Terramateterramate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Terramate | 74/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| CircleCIcircleci.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CircleCI | 61/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Codebergcodeberg.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Codeberg | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Daytonadaytona.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Daytona | 61/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Warpwarp.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Warp | 61/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GitHub | 57/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Retriumretrium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Retrium | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Onaona.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ona | 43/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Codacycodacy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Codacy | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Pulumipulumi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pulumi | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Bitbucket Cloudbitbucket.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Bitbucket Cloud | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.