Alternatives to Depot
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Depot does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Depot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Depot has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Depot does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Depot does not | Depot publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 74/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Namespacenamespace.so | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Codacycodacy.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Daggerdagger.io | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Oktetookteto.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Codebergcodeberg.org | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Buddybuddy.works | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Codeclimatecodeclimate.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Codefreshcodefresh.io | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.