Alternatives to Codeberg
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Codeberg does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Codeberg on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Codeberg has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Codeberg does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Codeberg does not | Codeberg publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 74/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Namespacenamespace.so | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Codacycodacy.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Aviatoraviator.co | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Depotdepot.dev | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Buddybuddy.works | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Codeclimatecodeclimate.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Daggerdagger.io | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Codefreshcodefresh.io | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.