SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Indico

Other Document AI and data capture vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Indico. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Indico on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Indico has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Indico” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at IndicoFound at Indico, not found there
Hypatoshypatos.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hypatos 65/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Parseurparseur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parseur 65/100 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Docsumodocsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docsumo 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Veryfiveryfi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryfi 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Bdo Digitalocrolus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bdo Digital 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Formxformx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Formx 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 nothing Compare
Mindeemindee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindee 57/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Nanonetsnanonets.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nanonets 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Abbyyabbyy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abbyy 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Deepsetdeepset.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepset 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Extendextend.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Extend 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Instabaseinstabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instabase 30/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.