Transparency alternatives to Beautiful.ai
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Beautiful.ai. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Beautiful.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Beautiful.ai has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Beautiful.ai” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Beautiful.ai | Found at Beautiful.ai, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FigJamfigma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FigJam | 87/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Preziprezi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prezi | 73/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Createlycreately.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Creately | 70/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pitchpitch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitch | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Conceptboardconceptboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conceptboard | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cacoonulab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cacoo | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stormboard | 52/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | nothing | Compare |
| Collaboardcollaboard.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Collaboard | 43/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidchart | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| MindMeistermindmeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MindMeister | 43/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Muralmural.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Mural | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gliffygliffy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gliffy | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.