Transparency alternatives to Pitch
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pitch. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Pitch on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pitch has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Pitch” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pitch | Found at Pitch, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FigJamfigma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FigJam | 87/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Preziprezi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prezi | 73/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Createlycreately.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Creately | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Conceptboardconceptboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conceptboard | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stormboard | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Whimsicalwhimsical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whimsical | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidchart | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Muralmural.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Mural | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Gliffygliffy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gliffy | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Ayoaayoa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ayoa | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
| MindMeistermindmeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MindMeister | 43/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Beautiful.aibeautiful.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Beautiful.ai | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.