Alternatives to Pitch
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pitch does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Pitch on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pitch has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Pitch does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Pitch does not | Pitch publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FigJamfigma.com | 87/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Preziprezi.com | 64/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Createlycreately.com | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Conceptboardconceptboard.com | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.com | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Gliffygliffy.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Ayoaayoa.com | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.co | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Muralmural.co | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Cacoonulab.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Beautiful.aibeautiful.ai | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Collaboracollaboraonline.com | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.