Transparency alternatives to FigJam
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at FigJam. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from FigJam on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
FigJam has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at FigJam” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at FigJam | Found at FigJam, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptboardconceptboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conceptboard | 52/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Cryptpadcryptpad.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Cryptpad | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Ayoaayoa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ayoa | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| HedgeDochedgedoc.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to HedgeDoc | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | Compare |
| Tometome.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Tome | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | Compare |
| Etherpadetherpad.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Etherpad | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | Compare |
| Preziprezi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prezi | 73/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Createlycreately.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Creately | 70/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pitchpitch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitch | 61/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stormboard | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Collaboardcollaboard.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Collaboard | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidchart | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.