Alternatives to FigJam
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FigJam does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from FigJam on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
FigJam has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and FigJam does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and FigJam does not | FigJam publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptboardconceptboard.com | 52/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Ayoaayoa.com | 43/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Cryptpadcryptpad.org | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| HedgeDochedgedoc.org | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | Compare |
| Etherpadetherpad.org | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | Compare |
| Createlycreately.com | 70/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.com | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Cacoonulab.com | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Gliffygliffy.com | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Collaboardcollaboard.app | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.co | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Muralmural.co | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.