SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to OpenText

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that OpenText does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from OpenText on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

OpenText has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and OpenText does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and OpenText does notOpenText publishes, and they do not
Templafytemplafy.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.com 52/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ademeroademero.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
DynaFiledynafile.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
windreamwindream.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Thereforetherefore.net 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare
d.velopd-velop.de 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
FileHoldfilehold.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
iManageimanage.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Ecodmsecodms.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Amagnoamagno.de 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
NetDocumentsnetdocuments.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.