SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to OpenText

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at OpenText. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 64 that differ from OpenText on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

OpenText has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at OpenText” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at OpenTextFound at OpenText, not found there
CloudFilescloudfiles.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudFiles 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Templafytemplafy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Templafy 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Intralinksintralinks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intralinks 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 nothing Compare
Smallpdfsmallpdf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smallpdf 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laserfiche 52/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Onehubonehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onehub 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ademeroademero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ademero 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare
DynaFiledynafile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DynaFile 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Papermarkpapermark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papermark 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
PaperOfficepaperoffice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PaperOffice 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Fabasoftfabasoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fabasoft 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Folderitfolderit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Folderit 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.