Alternatives to Ademero
Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ademero does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Ademero on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ademero has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Ademero does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Ademero does not | Ademero publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Templafytemplafy.com | 74/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Laserfichelaserfiche.com | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| DynaFiledynafile.com | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Thereforetherefore.net | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| DocuWaredocuware.com | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Ecodmsecodms.de | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| windreamwindream.com | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| OpenTextopentext.com | 20/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dokmeedokmee.com | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| M-Filesm-files.com | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| d.velopd-velop.de | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| FileHoldfilehold.com | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.