SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to DynaFile

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that DynaFile does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from DynaFile on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

DynaFile has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and DynaFile does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and DynaFile does notDynaFile publishes, and they do not
Templafytemplafy.com 74/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.com 52/100 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Ademeroademero.com 48/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
windreamwindream.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Dokmeedokmee.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
M-Filesm-files.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Thereforetherefore.net 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
d.velopd-velop.de 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
DocuWaredocuware.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
iManageimanage.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Ecodmsecodms.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Amagnoamagno.de 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.