Transparency alternatives to CloudFiles
Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CloudFiles. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 65 that differ from CloudFiles on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
CloudFiles has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS. The column “Found there, not found at CloudFiles” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at CloudFiles | Found at CloudFiles, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Templafytemplafy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Templafy | 74/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Laserfichelaserfiche.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laserfiche | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Onehubonehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onehub | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Intralinksintralinks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intralinks | 70/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ademeroademero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ademero | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| DynaFiledynafile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DynaFile | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Papermarkpapermark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papermark | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| PaperOfficepaperoffice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PaperOffice | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| SmartVaultsmartvault.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartVault | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| The Drive AIthedrive.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to The Drive AI | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Nimbus Cloud DMSnimbusportals.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nimbus Cloud DMS | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| OpenTextopentext.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenText | 20/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.