Transparency alternatives to Fabasoft
Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fabasoft. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 65 that differ from Fabasoft on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fabasoft has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Fabasoft” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fabasoft | Found at Fabasoft, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Templafytemplafy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Templafy | 74/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CloudFilescloudfiles.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudFiles | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Intralinksintralinks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intralinks | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Onehubonehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onehub | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Smallpdfsmallpdf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smallpdf | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Laserfichelaserfiche.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laserfiche | 52/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| DynaFiledynafile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DynaFile | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Papermarkpapermark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papermark | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ademeroademero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ademero | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SmartVaultsmartvault.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartVault | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| PaperOfficepaperoffice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PaperOffice | 39/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Folderitfolderit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Folderit | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.