Transparency alternatives to Pagefreezer
Other eDiscovery and archiving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pagefreezer. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Pagefreezer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pagefreezer has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pagefreezer” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pagefreezer | Found at Pagefreezer, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCOcsdisco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DISCO | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Mailbutlermailbutler.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailbutler | 43/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Everlaweverlaw.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Everlaw | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Nuixnuix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nuix | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Jatheonjatheon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jatheon | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Hanzohanzo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Hanzo | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Magnet Forensicsmagnetforensics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magnet Forensics | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Smarshsmarsh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smarsh | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| GoldFynchgoldfynch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoldFynch | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Lighthouselighthouseglobal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lighthouse | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Shieldshieldfc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shield | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Venioveniosystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Venio | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.