Transparency alternatives to Rational Enterprise
Other eDiscovery and archiving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rational Enterprise. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Rational Enterprise on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rational Enterprise has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Rational Enterprise” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Rational Enterprise | Found at Rational Enterprise, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCOcsdisco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DISCO | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hanzohanzo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Hanzo | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Jatheonjatheon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jatheon | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Mailbutlermailbutler.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailbutler | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Magnet Forensicsmagnetforensics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magnet Forensics | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Smarshsmarsh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smarsh | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Digital WarRoomdigitalwarroom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Digital WarRoom | 38/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CloudNinecloudnine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudNine | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Shieldshieldfc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shield | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Everlaweverlaw.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Everlaw | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Logikculllogikcull.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Logikcull | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Pagefreezerpagefreezer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pagefreezer | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.