SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Machtfit

Other Employee benefits vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Machtfit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 34 that differ from Machtfit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Machtfit has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Machtfit” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at MachtfitFound at Machtfit, not found there
Employee Navigatoremployeenavigator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employee Navigator 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Formajoinforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forma 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Benepassgetbenepass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benepass 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Modern Healthmodernhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modern Health 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nilo Healthnilohealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nilo Health 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Benefitfocusbenefitfocus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benefitfocus 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Spring Healthspringhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spring Health 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Unmindunmind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unmind 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Easeease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ease 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Lyra Healthlyrahealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lyra Health 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nava Benefitsnavabenefits.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nava Benefits 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Alightalight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alight 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.