SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Nava Benefits

Other Employee benefits vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Nava Benefits does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Nava Benefits on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Nava Benefits has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Nava Benefits does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Nava Benefits does notNava Benefits publishes, and they do not
Employee Navigatoremployeenavigator.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Formajoinforma.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Benepassgetbenepass.com 39/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nilo Healthnilohealth.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Modern Healthmodernhealth.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Easeease.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Alightalight.com 35/100 1 Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Beloniobelonio.de 35/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Calm Businessbusiness.calm.com 35/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Named privacy contact Compare
bswiftbswift.com 26/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Lyra Healthlyrahealth.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Corporate Benefitscorporate-benefits.de 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.