Transparency alternatives to Urban Sports Club
Other Employee benefits vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Urban Sports Club. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Urban Sports Club on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Urban Sports Club has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Urban Sports Club” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Urban Sports Club | Found at Urban Sports Club, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee Navigatoremployeenavigator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employee Navigator | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Formajoinforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forma | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Benepassgetbenepass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benepass | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Modern Healthmodernhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modern Health | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nilo Healthnilohealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nilo Health | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Benefitfocusbenefitfocus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benefitfocus | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Spring Healthspringhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spring Health | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Unmindunmind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unmind | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Easeease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ease | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lyra Healthlyrahealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lyra Health | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PlanSourceplansource.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PlanSource | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nava Benefitsnavabenefits.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nava Benefits | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.