SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Plugsurfing

Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Plugsurfing does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Plugsurfing on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Plugsurfing has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Plugsurfing does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Plugsurfing does notPlugsurfing publishes, and they do not
Driivzdriivz.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Hubjecthubject.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Chargepointchargepoint.com 32/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Reevreev.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Atlanteatlante.energy 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Easeeeasee.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Virtavirta.global 26/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Ellielli.eco 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Go-ego-e.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Montamonta.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Mennekesmennekes.de 15/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ampecoampeco.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.