SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Accelevents

Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Accelevents does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Accelevents on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Accelevents has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Accelevents does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Accelevents does notAccelevents publishes, and they do not
Bizzabobizzabo.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Eventzillaeventzilla.net 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Swapcardswapcard.com 43/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
vFairsvfairs.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
BigMarkerbigmarker.com 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Public pricing Compare
Universeuniverse.com 35/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cventcvent.com 32/100 1 Certifications named 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Weezeventweezevent.com 27/100 1 Status page with history 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Airmeetairmeet.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Eventbriteeventbrite.com 23/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Billettobilletto.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Certaincertain.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.