Transparency alternatives to Klippa
Other Expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Klippa. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Klippa on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Klippa has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Klippa” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Klippa | Found at Klippa, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brexbrex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brex | 70/100 | 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ExpenseInexpensein.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ExpenseIn | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Navannavan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navan | 48/100 | 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Payhawkpayhawk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payhawk | 57/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Rydoorydoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rydoo | 52/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Tipaltitipalti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tipalti | 48/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Emburseemburse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emburse | 43/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| Expensifyexpensify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Expensify | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ExpenseOnDemandexpenseondemand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ExpenseOnDemand | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Webexpenseswebexpenses.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Webexpenses | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Mobilexpensemobilexpense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mobilexpense | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Volopayvolopay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Volopay | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.