SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Klippa

Other Expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Klippa does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Klippa on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Klippa has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Klippa does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Klippa does notKlippa publishes, and they do not
Tipaltitipalti.com 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Emburseemburse.com 43/100 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare
Expensifyexpensify.com 43/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mobilexpensemobilexpense.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Brexbrex.com 65/100 1 Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Navannavan.com 65/100 1 Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Payhawkpayhawk.com 60/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Rydoorydoo.com 55/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Spendeskspendesk.com 43/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Pleopleo.io 32/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Soldosoldo.com 25/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Rampramp.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.